Satyameter Evidence-linked accuracy tracking for Indian TV news

← Leaderboard

Aman Chopra

News18 India Desh Nahi Jhukne Denge Hindi
78.1% claim accuracy
How accuracy is measuredAccuracy = accurate ÷ (accurate + inaccurate + misleading), over verdicts with confidence ≥ 0.7. Unverifiable claims are excluded from the denominator.
0 100 78.1%

95% confidence interval 67–86%

Why we rank by the confidence boundWe rank by the lower bound of this interval, not raw accuracy. A small sample yields a wide interval and a low bound — so anchors earn their rank by being checked more, not by looking good on a handful of claims.
. 73 checked of 118 checkable · 202 extracted.

Scrutiny
What scrutiny meansN checked of M checkable — the share of this anchor's checkable claims that have actually been fact-checked. High accuracy over low scrutiny is a provisional reading, not a verdict on the anchor.
 73/118

Verdict mix

104 of 202 extracted claims checked

104 of 202 extracted claims checked.

Coverage profile

Share of extracted claims by topic — click to drill in
opposition attack 36% communal religion 33% pakistan security 25% governance economy 3% crime 1% international 1% other 0%

Who is held responsible
How framing is measuredThe framing target of each claim — the party the anchor assigns responsibility to. Blaming the people involved frames differently from blaming the system that enabled the issue. Counted, not judged. Click a bar to read those claims.

Framing of blame across all extracted claims · click a bar to read them
This anchor most often points at Individuals 16 claims →
Individuals 16 System & institutions 1 Government 3 Opposition 133 A minority community 5 Foreign actor 31

Flagged claims

Judged inaccurate or misleading in the checked sample

Episodes analysed

17 broadcasts

All claims & verdicts

98 claims · filtered from 202
Claims from this anchor, newest first.
ClaimTopicVerdictConf.
Insinuates that the Muslim panelist is fighting on Pakistan's behalf and getting upset when Pakistan is abused. Muslim panelist loyalty communal religion not checked —
Those who shed tears for Gaza have forgotten the Pahalgam terror attack. Gaza vs Pahalgam sympathy opposition attack not checked —
Insinuates that the Congress panelist is advocating for an enemy country and may be paid by Pakistan. paid-agent insinuation opposition attack not checked —
In this debate one side has spoken, and now the 'Pakistan side' should also come — framing the opposing panelists as representing Pakistan's side. debate framing opposition attack not checked —
Advocating for Pakistan and sympathizing with it can win elections in Karachi or Islamabad, but in India it guarantees electoral defeat — so why do opposition leaders do it? pro-Pakistan advocacy opposition attack not checked —
These (opposition) leaders praise Pakistan even though they contest elections in India, not in Lyari, Pakistan. pro-Pakistan letter opposition attack not checked —
It is better to be a sycophant of the Indian tricolour than of Munir; the anchor and his side are devotees of Mother India, unlike his opponents. patriotism contrast opposition attack not checked —
The self-styled peace ambassadors advocating talks cannot guarantee that Pakistan will not send terrorists again. peace advocates' credibility opposition attack not checked —
India hit Pakistan in Operation Sindoor and will hit it again and again, because Pakistan is a hooligan whose behaviour cannot change through talks. Operation Sindoor pakistan security not checked —
Role-playing Pakistan in hypothetical talks: Pakistan's negotiating position is that it wants Kashmir, will march to Delhi, and will convert all of India to Islam — hence talks are pointless. futility of talks pakistan security not checked —
Sarcastically: according to his guest, Munir, Shehbaz and Hafiz Saeed are not spreading hatred but anchor Aman Chopra is — and the person saying this sits in India. hate speech accusation opposition attack not checked —
Pakistan should die of thirst, deprived of every drop of water — a chant the anchor demands his guest repeat on air. anti-Pakistan chant pakistan security not checked —
India has stopped Pakistan's water supply, and anyone pained by this (such as the letter signatories) is a Pakistan-lover. Indus water blockade pakistan security not checked —
Pakistan is like a dog's tail that can never be straightened — it is incapable of reforming, and army chief Munir cannot improve. Pakistan army leadership pakistan security not checked —
The letter-writers want terror and talks to resume simultaneously, which shows they are anti-army and treat Pakistan as their brother. terror and talks opposition attack not checked —
The anchor insinuates that the pressure on the signatories to push for peace may have come from Pakistan. Pakistan pressure insinuation opposition attack not checked —
These signatories do not even consider Kashmir a part of India. Kashmir loyalty opposition attack not checked —
Those who shed tears for Gaza did not say a single word about the gurdwara demolition in Pakistan. selective outrage Gaza opposition attack not checked —
The self-styled peace doves urging better ties with Pakistan act pained, as if the Indian Army were fighting a personal war, and their push to fix relations may be driven by the targeting of Hindus and the RSS. peace advocates' motives opposition attack not checked —
The real motive of those advocating friendship with Pakistan may be that Pakistan will kill Hindus — that is why they want the friendship. anti-Hindu motive allegation communal religion not checked —
In my view Pakistan is a rogue state and it should be destroyed and finished off. Pakistan rogue state pakistan security not checked —
The 61 letter signatories are Pakistan-lovers. Pakistan-lover label opposition attack not checked —
The people who wrote this letter are melting with sympathy and heartfelt pity for Pakistan. letter signatories' sympathy opposition attack not checked —