Compare
A bird's-eye view across all 10 anchors — no dossier needed. Every mark here is a door: click a dot, a bar segment, a heatmap cell or a donut slice to drop straight into the claims behind it.
Accuracy vs. scrutiny
Each dot is one anchor: how much has been checked (across) against how accurate it was (up). Dots far left are thinly measured; the whisker drops to the low end of the 95% interval. Click a dot for its dossier.
Topic mix, all anchors
What each anchor spends its airtime on. Every row is 100% of that anchor's claims; colours line up column-to-column so you can scan one topic straight down. Click a segment to see that anchor's claims in that topic.
- crime
- communal religion
- pakistan security
- governance economy
- international
- opposition attack
- healthcare
- science tech
- Other
Verdict mix, all anchors
Of everything extracted, how much is accurate, flagged, or still unchecked (hatched). Rows are ranked by the confidence-bound. Click a segment to see that anchor's claims with that verdict.
- Accurate
- Misleading
- Inaccurate
- Unverifiable
- Unchecked
Who gets the blame
For each anchor, the share of its framed claims that point at each target (each row sums to 100%). Darker = more often. Click any cell to read exactly those claims.
The whole corpus, one view
Every extracted claim by verdict. The centre counts what has actually been fact-checked so far — the hatched slice is everything still waiting. Click a slice to browse those claims.