← Leaderboard

Chitra Tripathi

ABP News Janhit Hindi
79.5% claim accuracy
How accuracy is measuredAccuracy = accurate ÷ (accurate + inaccurate + misleading), over verdicts with confidence ≥ 0.7. Unverifiable claims are excluded from the denominator.
0 100 79.5%

95% confidence interval 69–87%

Why we rank by the confidence boundWe rank by the lower bound of this interval, not raw accuracy. A small sample yields a wide interval and a low bound — so anchors earn their rank by being checked more, not by looking good on a handful of claims.
. 78 checked of 433 checkable · 524 extracted.

Scrutiny
What scrutiny meansN checked of M checkable — the share of this anchor's checkable claims that have actually been fact-checked. High accuracy over low scrutiny is a provisional reading, not a verdict on the anchor.
78/433

Verdict mix

124 of 524 extracted claims checked

124 of 524 extracted claims checked.

Coverage profile

Share of extracted claims by topic — click to drill in

Who is held responsible
How framing is measuredThe framing target of each claim — the party the anchor assigns responsibility to. Blaming the people involved frames differently from blaming the system that enabled the issue. Counted, not judged. Click a bar to read those claims.

Framing of blame across all extracted claims · click a bar to read them
This anchor most often points at Individuals 199 claims →

Flagged claims

Judged inaccurate or misleading in the checked sample

Episodes analysed

37 broadcasts

All claims & verdicts

400 claims · filtered from 524
Claims from this anchor, newest first.
ClaimTopicVerdictConf.
During that visit, Anil Mishra connected Champat Rai on a phone call with someone, after which Champat Rai returned without filing the FIR. FIR suppression call crime not checked
Champat Rai had actually gone to the police station on 27 May to file an FIR against the accused. FIR filing attempt crime not checked
On 27 May police caught six accused, taking Tinnu Yadav, Anukalp Mishra, and Karunesh Pandey into custody, and also apprehending Lavkush and Avinash Shukla. arrests of accused crime not checked
According to ABP News sources, the offering-theft case had already come to light on 27 May, and by that same day it was known who the culprits were. theft cover-up timeline crime not checked
Those entrusted with the responsibility of serving Ram turned out to be the thieves; jewellery was stolen and money was misappropriated. temple donation theft communal religion not checked
The anchor spent the entire day in Ayodhya speaking to people in every lane and neighbourhood, and all of them are stunned, troubled, and deeply saddened by the donation theft. devotee reaction Ayodhya communal religion not checked
Despite knowing about the theft, continuous attempts were made to suppress the news of the donation theft. news suppression crime not checked
This is proof that the Ram Mandir Trust knew well in advance that the donation theft was taking place. Trust prior knowledge crime not checked
Based on the statements of all arrested accused, police recovered the stolen donation money and jewellery from the Trust's locker. Trust locker recovery crime not checked
All arrested accused confessed that the Ram Mandir Trust had detected the donation theft before the police did. Trust prior knowledge crime not checked
The arrest papers contain confessional statements in which every arrested accused has admitted their guilt in the Ram Mandir donation theft. accused confessions crime not checked
Only ₹1 lakh was recovered from accused number seven, Ramshankar Yadav alias Tinnu, and police suspect he may have moved additional money elsewhere. hidden stolen money crime not checked
₹18,763 was recovered from accused number six, Karunesh Pandey. stolen money recovery crime not checked
₹7,32,170 was recovered from accused Ramashankar Mishra. stolen money recovery crime not checked
₹1,25,000 of stolen donation money was recovered from arrested accused Lavkush Mishra. stolen money recovery crime not checked
Accused Anukalp Mishra also admitted committing theft and embezzlement during money counting at the temple trust, and ₹16,08,240 was recovered based on his disclosure. counting-room embezzlement crime not checked
From accused Avinash Shukla, police recovered ₹39,220 in cash, 10,121 US dollars (over ₹1 lakh), 160 grams of silver-like metal, an approximately 8-gram gold-like chain, and an approximately 3.5-gram yellow-metal ring. cash jewellery recovery crime not checked
Accused Avinash stated that after the theft was caught, he returned the remaining stolen donation money to the Trust, following which police seized the stolen money and jewellery from the Trust based on his disclosure. stolen money return crime not checked
Accused Avinash Shukla admitted that theft and embezzlement took place during the counting of donation money at the temple trust. counting-room embezzlement crime not checked
The papers shown are the arrest documents of seven of the eight accused arrested in the donation theft case. accused arrests crime not checked
The documents are proof that the Ram Mandir Trust had complete knowledge of the donation theft. Trust cover-up crime not checked
The documents in the anchor's possession are the confession statements of the accused in the donation theft and constitute the first firm evidence proving the theft. accused confessions crime not checked
Champat Rai told his close aides that he will not leave Ayodhya carrying this stigma. Champat Rai response crime not checked
ABP News was the first to make revelations holding Champat Rai responsible in the Ram Mandir donation theft case. donation theft expose crime not checked
One should fear one's own wrongdoings rather than God; God forgives, but bad deeds never stop following you. karma morality other not checked