Navika Kumar
How accuracy is measured
Accuracy = accurate ÷ (accurate + inaccurate + misleading), over verdicts with confidence ≥ 0.7. Unverifiable claims are excluded from the denominator.
95% confidence interval 77–95%
Why we rank by the confidence bound
We rank by the lower bound of this interval, not raw accuracy. A small sample yields a wide interval and a low bound — so anchors earn their rank by being checked more, not by looking good on a handful of claims.
What scrutiny means
N checked of M checkable — the share of this anchor's checkable claims that have actually been fact-checked. High accuracy over low scrutiny is a provisional reading, not a verdict on the anchor.Verdict mix
72 of 109 extracted claims checked- Accurate 52
- Misleading 12
- Inaccurate 3
- Unverifiable 5
- Unchecked 37
72 of 109 extracted claims checked.
Coverage profile
Share of extracted claims by topic — click to drill inWho is held responsible
How framing is measured
The framing target of each claim — the party the anchor assigns responsibility to. Blaming the people involved frames differently from blaming the system that enabled the issue. Counted, not judged. Click a bar to read those claims.
Framing of blame across all extracted claims · click a bar to read them
How framing is measured
The framing target of each claim — the party the anchor assigns responsibility to. Blaming the people involved frames differently from blaming the system that enabled the issue. Counted, not judged. Click a bar to read those claims.Flagged claims
Judged inaccurate or misleading in the checked sample-
misleading confidence 72.0% 4 sourcesAccused like Lavkush Mishra are now facing bulldozer action, while accountability appears to stop at the lowest rung.
“व्हाइल अक्यू लाइक लवकुश मिश्रा आर नाउ फेसिंग बुलडोजर एक्शन विल अकाउंटेबिलिटी स्टॉप विथ द लोएस्ट ट्रंप”
-
inaccurate confidence 90.0% 3 sourcesIt has been 27 days since the first recovery of allegedly embezzled Ram Mandir donation funds.
“इट हैज़ बीन 27 डेज सिंस द फर्स्ट रिकवरी ऑफ़ अ लेजिडली एंबेसडल्ड राम मंदिर डोनेशन फंड”
-
misleading confidence 72.0% 4 sourcesWhen Rahul Gandhi was portrayed as Parshuram and given a milk abhishekam, the critics now objecting stayed silent.
“तो यह जो परशुराम बनाकर 15 साल की बच्ची दूध का अभिषेक हो रहा था राहुल गांधी को तब आवाज क्यों नहीं निकली थी आपकी?”
-
misleading confidence 62.0% 4 sources34 countries have now honoured Prime Minister Modi with their top distinctions; this is not a one-off instance.
“बट व्हाट द अपोजिशन फॉरगेट्स इज दैट दिस इज़ नॉट अ वन ऑफ इंस्टेंस 34 कंट्रीज हैव नाउ ऑनर्ड द प्राइम मिनिस्टर विथ देयर टॉप डिस्टिंक्शंस”
-
inaccurate confidence 72.0% 3 sourcesOn the 5th of June, trust representatives accompanied by police reached an accused's residence and recovered nearly Rs 58 lakh.
“ऑन 5th ऑफ जून ट्रस्ट रिप्रेजेंटेटिव्स अकंपनीड बाय पुलिस रीच्ड एन अक्यूज्ड रेजिडेंस एंड रिकवर्ड नियरली 58 लाख रूपीस”
-
misleading confidence 60.0% 4 sourcesA prescribed form (Form 8) exists for corrections in voter rolls and sufficient time was given in all states, yet the opposition parties cannot say how many such forms they filed.
“देयर इज़ अ फॉर्मेट व्हिच इज़ मेंट टू करेक्शन इन वोटर रोल्स। देयर इज़ सफिशंट टाइम गिवेन इन ऑल द स्टेट्स। हाउ मेनी फॉर्म एट्स वर फिल्ड? डू यू नो दैट?”
-
inaccurate confidence 90.0% 4 sourcesThe SIR exercise already took place during previous elections in Kerala and Tamil Nadu along with other states, and the DMK did not create any showdown over voter rolls there.
“आफ्टर ऑल द एसआईआर एक्सरसाइज ड्यूरिंग द प्रीवियस इलेक्शंस टूक प्लेस इन केरला, इन योर स्टेट ऑफ तमिलनाडु अलोंग विद अदर स्टेट्स... यू डिड नॉट क्रिएट एनी शोडाउन।”
-
misleading confidence 62.0% 5 sourcesRahul Gandhi has criticised SIR as an anti-national act, yet his own party's Chief Minister is encouraging participation in it.
“इफ वन गोज बाई राहुल गांधीस क्रिटिसिज्म ऑफ एसआईआर बीइंग एन एंटी नेशनल एक्ट, व्हाई इज़ हिज़ ओन पार्टी चीफ मिनिस्टर एनकरेजिंग पार्टिसिपेशन?”
-
misleading confidence 65.0% 5 sourcesThe drivers who were leading the donation theft are now in jail, while the trust officials they worked for remain part of the trust.
“द पीपल हुज़ ड्राइवर्स वेर लीडिंग दिस, हु आर नाउ इन जेल, आर नाउ स्टिल गोइंग टू बी पार्ट ऑफ़ द ट्रस्ट।”
-
misleading confidence 70.0% 5 sourcesThe drivers of the trust officials were overseeing the entire working of the Ram Mandir donation portfolio, yet the officials remain in place as if nothing happened.
“देयर ड्राइवर्स... दे वर ओवरसीइंग दी एंटायर वर्किंग ऑफ द राम मंदिर डोनेशन पोर्टफोलियो एंड दे आर स्टिल सिटींग देयर प्रिटेंडिंग नथिंग हैज़ हैपेंड।”
-
misleading confidence 60.0% 4 sourcesThe man who was managing the temple trust, under whose nose the embezzlement took place, is still in charge of the trust's affairs.
“द मैन हु वास् मैनेजिंग द ट्रस्ट अंडर हूज़ नोस दिस एंबेज़लमेंट वास् टेकिंग प्लेस इज़ स्टिल इन चार्ज ऑफ़ द ट्रस्ट अफेयर्स।”
-
misleading confidence 60.0% 4 sourcesInvestigators have so far recovered more than ₹1 crore, and the alleged loot was confined to cash donations alone.
“सो फार इन्वेस्टिगेटर्स हैव रिकवर्ड मोर देन ₹1 करोड़ रूपीस एंड दी अलेजिड लूट वाज़ कनफाइंड टू कैश डोनेशंस अलोन।”
-
misleading confidence 60.0% 5 sourcesThe UP elections are around the corner in a few months, and the opposition has chosen the moment when the donation-theft investigation has put the spotlight on the Ram Mandir to launch its campaign.
“बट राइट नाउ बिकॉज़ ऑफ़ द चंदा चोरी केस एंड इन्वेस्टीगेशन, द स्पॉटलाइट इज़ ऑन राम मंदिर। व्हाई इज दैट द ओपोरर्चुन मोमेंट टू डिक्लेयर द कैंपेन फॉर द यूपी इलेक्शंस अराउंड द कॉर्नर इन अ फ्यू मंथ्स?”
-
misleading confidence 70.0% 4 sourcesAjay Rai had wanted to go with his supporters but did not have permission to do so; now that permission has been given, he is going — everything happened as per process and procedure.
“अजय राय हेड वांटेड टू गो विद हिज़ सपोर्टर्स, डिड नॉट हैव परमिशन टू गो देयर विद सपोर्टर्स। नाउ दैट द परमिशन हैज़ बीन गिवेन, ही इज़ गोइंग... एवरीथिंग हैपेंस विद प्रोसेस एंड प्रोसीजर।”
-
misleading confidence 65.0% 5 sourcesThe Special Investigation Team questioned Ram Mandir Trust general secretary Champat Rai for nearly three hours, and sources claim some trust members allegedly received up to 40% commissions for handling donations.
“ऑन अ डे, व्हेन द स्पेशल इन्वेस्टिगेशन टीम क्वेश्चन ट्रस्ट जनरल सेक्रेटरी, चंपत राय फॉर नियरली थ्री आवर्स एंड सोर्सेस क्लेम दैट सम ट्रस्ट मेंबर्स आर लेजिडली रिसीव्ड अप टू 40% कमीशंस फॉर हैंडलिंग डोनेशंस”
Episodes analysed
40 broadcasts- Khushbu Sundar Exclusive: Former NCW Member Shares Her Views On Bengaluru Day Care Horror | WATCH discovered 0 claims
- Most Sensational Expose In Ram Mandir Chanda Chori Case: Time To Add 'Big Fish' In Loot F.I.R? WATCH analyzed 19 claims
- Ram Mandir 'Loot': More Rot Uncovered; Gold Jewels Stolen Too| Bhakts & Propriety Taken For Granted? analyzed 19 claims
- Intellectuals' 'Forget It & Let's Talk' Pitch Despite Pahalgam | Terror & Talks: Carnage Forgotten? discovered 0 claims
- Ram Mandir Chanda Chori Row: Yogi Slams 'Political Bhakts'; Polls Ahead, Oppn Resets 'Ram Record'? analyzed 15 claims
- Rahul Gandhi Vs DK Shivakumar? Karnataka CM Enrolls S.I.R | 'SIR-Cus': Will Oppn 'Revise' Stance? analyzed 19 claims
- Seychelles Honours Modi, Oppn 'Spell Checks' Award; India's 'Pride', Opposition's 'Envy'? Newshour analyzed 13 claims
- Ram Mandir Chanda Chori: Oppn Says Mandir Looted Like Ghazni| 'Mandir Marg': For Bhakti Or Rajneeti? analyzed 24 claims
- Ram Mandir Chanda Chori Case: 8 Arrested, Champat Rai Quits; Action Enough To Restore 'Trust'? WATCH transcribed 0 claims
- Pune Horror: Why Didn't Siya Call Off The Wedding? Was Ketan's Thinning Hair A Trigger? Newshour discovered 0 claims
- 'Hypocrisy' On Fast Lane, Trump Avenue Inaugurated In Hyderabad | Congress 'Surrenders' Credibility? transcribed 0 claims
- Ally's Clean Chit Upsets Congress' 'Scams' Playbook Against BJP; Corruption Crossfire: Oppn Divided? discovered 0 claims
- Pradeep Bhandari Targets Gandhi-Vadra Family, Sparks Massive Corruption Showdown discovered 0 claims
- Ayodhya Ram Mandir Donation Row To Deepam Firestorm In Tamil Nadu, Who's Betraying Faith Of Hindus? discovered 0 claims
- Vijay Mimics Stalin In Assembly, Udhayanidhi Gets Personal; New Sarkar But Same Old Mindset? WATCH transcribed 0 claims
All claims & verdicts
1 claim · filtered from 109| Claim | Topic | Verdict | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Champat Rai had the evidence — trust representatives went to the accused's house, took back Rs 58 lakh, and then pretended nothing had ever happened. Champat Rai cover-up | crime | not checked | — |