Leaderboard · Rubika Liyaquat · Framing: Individuals

Rubika Liyaquat — claims framing blame at: Individuals

113 claims where Rubika Liyaquat points responsibility at Individuals · News Ki Pathshala.

The claims

113 claims, newest first
DateClaimTopicVerdictConf.
2026-07-02 Some employees under the Ram Mandir Trust could not rid themselves of greed, betraying the vision of Ram Rajya that was promised. trust employees' greed communal religion not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai must take responsibility and keep himself away from the trust until the investigation fully clears the matter. accountability demand communal religion not checked
2026-07-02 Accused Tinnu Yadav had hidden money in a tin box — notes stuffed in a steel tank in a hostel room — from which cash was recovered. hidden cash crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai's driver moved around freely anywhere in the temple premises whenever he wished. driver access crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai is on the Ayodhya police's radar and has been subjected to extensive police questioning in the donation theft case. Champat Rai questioning crime accurate 80.0%
2026-07-02 Champat Rai failed to fulfil the responsibility of managing the Ram Mandir Trust that was entrusted to him. trust mismanagement communal religion not checked
2026-07-02 If Champat Rai remains in his chair with full authority after resigning, the investigation could be influenced. investigation interference communal religion not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai, who is facing questioning, has resigned as general secretary of the Ram Mandir Trust but continues to occupy his post and carry out daily work inside the temple. Champat Rai resignation communal religion accurate 70.0%
2026-07-02 About Rs 18 lakh was recovered from accused Karunesh Pandey and about Rs 14 lakh from Lavkush Mishra. cash recovery accused crime not checked
2026-07-02 Accused Tinnu Yadav hid money in a tin box, with currency notes stuffed in a steel tank in a hostel room, which took police time to find. hidden cash concealment crime not checked
2026-07-02 Rs 20 lakh 39 thousand was recovered from the first accused, Avinash Shukla. cash recovery Shukla crime not checked
2026-07-02 Sacks full of stolen donation money are being recovered from the homes of the accused. stolen cash recovery crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai's driver (Tinnu Yadav) moved freely anywhere in the temple premises whenever he wished, and Champat Rai knew this well. driver temple access crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai is on the Ayodhya police's radar and police have questioned him extensively in the donation theft case. donation theft probe crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai must take responsibility and keep himself away from the Ram Mandir Trust until the investigation fully clears the matter. trust accountability communal religion not checked
2026-07-02 Approximately ₹18 lakh was recovered from accused Karunesh Pandey and about ₹14 lakh from Lavkush Mishra. recovered amounts crime not checked
2026-07-02 Accused Tinnu Yadav had hidden money in a tin box, and about ₹1 lakh was recovered from his premises. Tinnu Yadav recovery crime not checked
2026-07-02 Police recovered approximately ₹20.39 lakh from accused Avinash Shukla, about ₹1.82 lakh from Anukalp Mishra, and about ₹7 lakh from Ramashankar Mishra. recovered amounts crime not checked
2026-07-02 There are a total of seven accused in the case, one of them unidentified, and a total of ₹80,85,000 has been recovered from them so far. recovered amounts crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai told police that Tinnu Yadav was an acquaintance but had no unlimited or official authority; the anchor adds that his driver nonetheless moved freely everywhere in the temple premises. Tinnu Yadav links crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai must take responsibility and keep himself away from the Trust until the truth is fully established; Gopal Rao and Anil Mishra should do the same. trustee accountability crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai himself had said that an SIT should investigate and that he should be questioned first. SIT probe demand crime not checked
2026-07-02 If Champat Rai remains in his chair with full authority over the Trust's affairs after resigning, the investigation could be influenced/compromised. investigation integrity crime not checked
2026-07-02 Even after resigning as general secretary, Champat Rai continues to sit in his position and goes inside the temple daily to carry out his regular work. Champat Rai resignation crime not checked
2026-07-02 Champat Rai has been accused, questioned twice by police, and has submitted his resignation, yet he still occupies his position in the Ram Mandir Trust. Champat Rai resignation crime not checked