← Arnab Goswami

misleading
confidence 90.0%
AI-assessed — pending human review

Claim

The Supreme Court today declined to urgently list a plea seeking a CBI-led investigation into the Ram Mandir donation theft, so those demanding a CBI probe are going against the Supreme Court's decision.

“यू एंड कपिल शुड रियलाइज़ दैट द सुप्रीम कोर्ट टुडे डिक्लाइंड टू अर्जेंटली लिस्ट अ प्ली सीकिंग अ सीबीआई लेड इनवेस्टीगेशन। यू आर गोइंग अगेंस्ट द डिसिशन ऑफ़ द सुप्रीम कोर्ट टुडे।”
Arnab Goswami · The Debate with Arnab Goswami · factual communal religion
▶ Watch source segment

Rationale

The factual core is accurate: on 29 June 2026 the Supreme Court did decline to urgently list a plea seeking a CBI-led investigation into the Ram Mandir donation theft. However, the anchor's inference — that anyone demanding a CBI probe is thereby 'going against the Supreme Court's decision' — is misleading. The court made no decision on the merits; it only refused an expedited/urgent hearing ('Heavens are not going to fall') and directed the matter to a regular bench after the vacation. Declining urgency is a scheduling call, not a rejection of the CBI-probe demand, and the petitions remain pending. Framing a procedural refusal to fast-track as a substantive verdict against the CBI probe misrepresents what the court did.

Evidence