Claim
On 30 June, the High Court declined an urgent hearing of TMC's petition, saying it would not treat the matter as a special case.
“30 जून को हाईकोर्ट ने टीएमसी की याचिका पर तत्काल सुनवाई से इंकार करते हुए कहा कि वो इस मामले को स्पेशल केस की तरह नहीं देखने वाले।”▶ Watch source segment
Rationale
Multiple reports confirm that on 30 June 2026 the Calcutta High Court (Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya) declined an urgent/priority hearing of the TMC's petition against the freezing of its bank accounts, directing that it be taken up per the regular cause list rather than as a special/priority matter — matching the anchor's claim that the court refused urgent hearing and would not treat it as a special case. The claim says 'High Court' without naming Calcutta HC, but the date, party (TMC), and substance align precisely.
Evidence
- https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/calcutta-high-court-refuses-urgent-hearing-on-tmc-plea-against-freeze-of-440-crore-bank-accounts-1607588 Reports that on Tuesday, 30 June 2026, Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya of the Calcutta High Court declined an urgent/priority hearing of the TMC plea against the freeze of ~₹440 crore in bank accounts, saying it would be heard according to its position in the regular cause list rather than given special/priority treatment. ✓ reachable · archived
- https://www.deccanherald.com/india/west-bengal/bank-account-freeze-calcutta-hc-refuses-urgent-hearing-to-mamata-led-tmc-faction-4057002 Deccan Herald (published 30 June 2026) confirms the Calcutta HC refused an urgent hearing to the Mamata-led TMC faction over the frozen bank accounts. ✓ reachable · archived
- https://supremetoday.ai/cal-high-court-denies-urgent-hearing-on-tmc-account-freeze-20260630103 Corroborates the 30 June 2026 denial of urgent hearing on the TMC account-freeze petition. ✓ reachable · archived