Claim
Action may be taken in the Bengaluru day care case under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act.
“बेंगलुरु डे केयर केस में जिनाइल जस्टिस एक्ट की धारा 75 के तहत कारवाई हो सकती है।”▶ Watch source segment
Rationale
The anchor's hedged statement that action may be taken under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act in the Bengaluru daycare case matches the record as of the 2 July 2026 broadcast: the FIR registered by HAL Police against five caregivers at the daycare inside the Capgemini campus invoked Section 75 of the JJ Act (cruelty to a child by a caregiver, punishable with up to 3–10 years) alongside BNS Section 351(2). If anything, the claim understates events, since Section 75 had already been applied, not merely contemplated.
Evidence
- https://www.onmanorama.com/news/india/2026/07/02/daycare-toddler-abuse-fir-bengaluru.html Reports the FIR in the Bengaluru daycare toddler-abuse case (crèche at the Capgemini campus, Brookefield) was filed on 2 July 2026 against five caregivers under provisions including the Juvenile Justice Act. ✓ reachable · archived
- https://www.republicworld.com/india/bengaluru-daycare-horror-case-registered-under-juvenile-justice-jj-act-caretaker-arrested-more-arrests-likely-as-probe-deepens-2026-07-03-131052 Confirms the case was registered under the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act, with one caretaker arrested and further arrests expected. ✓ reachable · archived
- https://www.outlookindia.com/national/bengaluru-creche-abuse-fir-against-five-caregivers-at-capgemini-campus-daycare Reports HAL Police registered the FIR against five caregivers under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act; contemporaneous reports specify Section 75 JJ Act along with BNS Section 351(2). ✓ reachable · archived