← Leaderboard

Arnab Goswami

Republic TV The Debate with Arnab Goswami English
79.7% claim accuracy
How accuracy is measuredAccuracy = accurate ÷ (accurate + inaccurate + misleading), over verdicts with confidence ≥ 0.7. Unverifiable claims are excluded from the denominator.
0 100 79.7%

95% confidence interval 68–88%

Why we rank by the confidence boundWe rank by the lower bound of this interval, not raw accuracy. A small sample yields a wide interval and a low bound — so anchors earn their rank by being checked more, not by looking good on a handful of claims.
. 64 checked of 154 checkable · 201 extracted.

Scrutiny
What scrutiny meansN checked of M checkable — the share of this anchor's checkable claims that have actually been fact-checked. High accuracy over low scrutiny is a provisional reading, not a verdict on the anchor.
64/154

Verdict mix

104 of 201 extracted claims checked

104 of 201 extracted claims checked.

Coverage profile

Share of extracted claims by topic — click to drill in

Who is held responsible
How framing is measuredThe framing target of each claim — the party the anchor assigns responsibility to. Blaming the people involved frames differently from blaming the system that enabled the issue. Counted, not judged. Click a bar to read those claims.

Framing of blame across all extracted claims · click a bar to read them
This anchor most often points at Individuals 40 claims →

Flagged claims

Judged inaccurate or misleading in the checked sample

Episodes analysed

25 broadcasts

All claims & verdicts

2 claims · filtered from 201
Subtopic: PoK protest crackdown ×